返回总库    

学科分类

社会主义核心价值观的文化基因

作者: 赵壮道
出版日期:2018-01-01
浏览次数:1次
简介: 本书分析了社会主义核心价值观与集体主义的理论分野,揭示了社会主义核心价值观与集体主义在价值原点、价值体系、制度载体、价值目标等方面的理论共域,并用中国三大名村——华西村、小岗村、南街村的典型案例,探寻了用集体主义培育践行社会主义核心价值观的实现路径,最终提出了社会主义核心价值观的文化基因是集体主义的学术论断。
关键词: 社会主义建设  价值论  文化  

匈牙利看“一带一路”和中国—中东欧合作

出版日期:2017-05-01
浏览次数:168次
简介: Hungary is a middle sized country either in the terms of national territorial area or in terms of population in Central Europe. However, Hungary has its special status in developing relations with China. In November 2016 when the Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi received the visiting Hungarian counterpartner Peter Szijarto who is attending the first China-Hungary working group meeting on implementation of the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI), Wang said that there are a lot of Firsts which the bilateral relationship had made. Hungary is the first European country who signed the inter-governmental cooperation memorandum with China on implementation of BRI, the first country who had set up and started the working group meeting with China implementing BRI, the first country in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) China had set up RMB clearance bank, the first country in CEE who had issued RMB Bonds, the first country in CEE China had set up tourist representative office, as well as the first European country where they run the bilingual school in their mother language and Chinese language in the national education system. All these Firsts witness the high level of China-Hungarian relationship. Last but not least, Chinese leaders had visited Hungary in recent years. Xi Jinping had visited in 2009 and Li Keqiang in 2012, as well as Hu Jintao in 2004 and Wen Jiabao in 2011. It is the only such country in CEE, nevertheless in the world.In 2011 when Premier Wen Jiabao visited Hungary, China-CEEC Trade and Economic Cooperation Forum had been held in Budapest, which became the prelude of the China-CEEC Cooperation Mechanism that had been established one year later in Warsaw. After the official announcement of BRI, all 16 CEE countries in the Chine-CEEC Cooperation Mechanism were covered by BRI. In June 2015, Hungary became the first European country who had signed the Memorandum of Understanding with China on “Jointly Building the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. In November 2016, China and Hungary set up BRI joint working group and Hungary became the first European country who has the institutionalized cooperation in BRI. In 2017, China-CEEC Summit will be held in Budapest, Hungary will be the host again after 6 years cooperation and welcome the leaders of China-CEEC Cooperation Mechanism, by deepening the such cooperation mechanism and promoting the implementation of BRI in CEE region.This Think Tank Report has a special Hungarian angle. The editor of the Report had invited the scholars from famous Hungarian Think Tanks and research institutions to drafting papers, and elaborating their understandings on BRI and China-CEEC Cooperation. The Report should be the first product on BRI from a single BRI country.There are several significance of the Report. The first one is the Preface written by Cecilia Szilas, the Ambassador of Hungary to the People’s Republic of China. In her opinion, the world economic center of gravity is shifting from West to East, from the Atlantic region to the Pacific region with China being the focus. In 2010 the Hungarian Government decided that in addition to their traditional European markets it was necessary to put emphasized focus on developing economic and trade relations with the Eastern countries that have maintained significant growth during even the worst period of the crisis. This is what Hungary calls the “Eastern Opening” policy. The most important among them is the People’s Republic of China, the most significant trading partner of Hungary in Asia. As Hungary had opened toward the East, China had announced its own “One Belt, One Road” Initiative, to revive historical Silk Road economies and trade ties towards the West. The two policies complementing each other, Hungary, expressed its intention to contribute to the “One Belt, One Road” Initiative very early on, becoming the first “Belt and Road” Country in the European Union.The second significance of the Report is the authorization from the relevant Hungarian authorities on the permit to include two important speeches on BRI and Relations with China by the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the Governor of Hungarian Central Bank (MNB) Gyorgy Matolcsy respectively.In January 2017, invited by the MNB, the editor of the Report had attended the Lamfalussy Conference 2017 in Budapest. Viktor Orban had delivered a keynote speech at the Conference, which had been included into the Report. In his speech, Orban points out that China’s rise draws attention in Europe to a psychological problem, whether there is a willingness to accept China’s rise. There is a saying that “whatever exists is possible”, it applies to China, as well to the UK and USA. But the Europeans do not understand this, at least when it comes to China’s rise, the Brexit as well as the “America First”. Instead of trying to learn from this, they invest a a considerable energy in explaining that what exists is not really there. Or if it is, then it is only temporary and without foundations. In fact, since the 2008 financial crisis, the world economy and world politics have experienced a paradigm change, from single center of power to multiple centers of power. And today the success of European countries is measured by how rapidly they have been able to implement this change: which ones responded immediately, which ones reacted more slowly, and which ones are still in the process of waking up. A necessary concomitant of any change of paradigm is that the followers of the old order must engage in fierce debate with the followers of the new order. A world order with multiple centres has great many inherent opportunities to offer. Here is China. In Orban’s opinion it is clear that China is not a comet, but a fixed star, that will have a determining role in the world economy for many decades at least. With due respect it should be mentioned that in 2013 it was President Xi Jinping who launched the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, which was the first in a series which Orban believe will follow in the period ahead. Regarding Europe, Orban declares that Europe is struggling with four major crises at once, namely growth crisis, demographic crisis, security crisis as well as foreign policy crisis. Brussels has become enslaved to a utopia, and recently it has been unable to respond to any of the crisis satisfactorily. The European continent is becoming ever weaker: it has been reduced from a global player to a regional player, and soon it will be forced to struggle even for the status of a regional player. If we look to the European continent’s successful periods, we can see that Europe was never strong when it was directed by a single centre of power. We were strong when multiple centres of power existed within Europe. And today, it is policies of Brussels that transform these centres of power into a single centre of power. This answers the question of how we got to where we are today, referred to Orban’s speech. Hungary has turned from a black sheep into a success story from 2010 to 2016. Orban concludes the Hungarian model consists of four parts, namely political stability, strict fiscal policy, a workfare society as well as eastward opening. At the heart of the eastward opening lies respect instead of trade, and those who do not accept that respect takes priority over ideology will never be able to open to the East, because they do not understand the peoples of the East. In this respect Hungary is luckier, because Hungarian is an eastern people which was infused with Christianity, and this gives Hungarian a special perspective, enabling Hungarian to understand all that is happening in China.Hungarian has been regarded as a nation originated from East. For example, Hungarian is the only nation in Europe who has the family name first and the surname the second.Another speech was made by Gyorgy Matolcsy, the Governor of the Hungarian Central Bank, who delivered at the 54th Annul Conference of Hungarian Economist on 15 September 2016. The title of the speech is “Hungary: A Key State on the Silk Road”. Matolcsy started with the comparison between Hungary and Greece which went into crisis one and after another. Due to the different counter-crisis approach, Hungary is out of the crisis, therefor Greece is still suffering. The Greeks went down an orthodox, traditional, conventional path of economy policy forced on them by the “troika” (IMF, European Committee, European Central Bank). The Hungarian chose a specifically Hungarian path, focusing on structural reforms, and were able to preserve the autonomy of the economic policy. The path forced by the troika narrowed Greece’s room for manoeuvre. The way we chose broadened Hungary’s room for manoeuvre. The Greeks raised income tax, introduced property tax, the policy was accompanied by lay-offs and pension cuts. The minimum wage was lowered and they tried to implement privatisations. The Hungarians cut income taxes and the taxation balance was shifted to turnover and sectoral taxes. They introduced public employment and the career model. The Hungarian structural reforms were included in the first and second Széll Kálmán Plans, the national development plan. Hungary is one of the three best performers in the European Union regarding public debt reduction, and Greece is one of the five worst performers. In the second part of his speech, Matolcsy compared the economic development path between Hungary and Poland. In the past 20 years, the Polish have been the best in the European Union. With their annual GDP growth of 4% lasting for twenty years, they glided, slid over the crisis of 2008-2009 and there was not a downturn. There is a reform competition going on in the entire region. The Polish are in a better position because they introduced structural reform 10 years earlier, at the beginning of the 2000s, when Hungary indebted. The direction of the Polish reforms and the Hungarian transformation commencing 10 years later was the same. The Polish won the competition between 2000 and 2010. There are two or three similar countries in the European Union, such as Germany, where the global financial crisis did not toss the economic performance into the depth. But why had the Polish introduce the reforms ten years earlier? Because they were in a crisis then. They were motivated to the reform policy by such challenge. Hungary lost the reform competition against Poland in the 2000s, but since then Hungary have been standing firm. In the last part of the speech, the Governor had pointed out that all the schemes must be prepared concentrating on three big centres of world economy, namely Europe, North America and Northeast Asia and East Asia, especially China. Hungarian GDP is €100 billion, the Austrian is €300 billion, that of Baden-Württemberg is €460 billion, the Bavarian one is €500 billion. The difference is great, and still, it is reasonable to talk about the idea of implementing a sustainable catch-up turnaround and process in the next 30 years. The second €100 million of the Hungarian GDP can be found in Asia, especially in China. Hungary is in the globalization through German channels, now Hungary should pay more attention to Silk Road because it is where the second €100 million can be achieved. The Hungarian Central Bank had promoted the implementation of BRI in Hungary, such as currency SWAP with PBoC, Budapest RMB Initiative, RMB dominated bond purchase, Issuing Tim Sum Bond in Hong Kong. Last but not least, BOC Hungaria Co. had been authorized as the RMB clearance center in Central and Eastern Europe.The third significance of the Report is the invited papers by the two former ambassadors of Hungary to China. Sandor Kusai was the Ambassador to China between 2008-2014. He had personally experienced the period of the preparation and the initiation of BRI and China-CEEC Cooperation Mechanism. The transregional Cooperation between 16 CEE Countries and China went through a two-phase history of establishment, stabilization and then in-depth development within six years, and got closely interconnected with BRI. This cooperation achieved considerable results and acquired some new and unique characteristics, which provided a solid basis for its further development. The interests and motivations of its participants continue to evolve under the influence of changing regional and global environment, especially under the pressing need for an improved model of globalization. Kusai sums up some lessons of its development and identifies some major tasks for preserving its dynamism, focusing on the win-win economic cooperation, strengthening its transregional character, improving its perception in the European Union, and adapting it to the changing global environment. The accomplishment of those tasks may guarantee and improve further the bright prospects for this valuable cooperation framework.Juhasz Otto was the Hungarian Ambassador to China in 1990s. He studied in Beijing in 1950s and now continues his study on China with papers and books. The paper he submitted to the Report is “The New Challenge for EU and the New Amber Road” which is together drafted by Prof. Andras Inotai, who was the director of the Institute for World Economy at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The authors analyze the crisis and challenges the EU was facing and as one mistake induced another, the EU eventually walked into the Turkish trap. A great Hungarian poet called Hungary a “ferryboat-country”, meaning that Hungary shuttles between the Western and the Eastern banks of an imaginary river between the East and the West. Building China-CEEC relationship does not contradict or even less undermine EU solidarity, since China is obviously interested in a stronger Union which has the capacity to become a key player and one of the centers of international politics. Ambassador Juhasz had raise the concept “Amber Road” in December 2014 in Guangming Daily. The antique Amber Road was an important and well-built route serving the Roman Empire. Its building started in the beginning of the 1st century. It led from the Baltic Sea to the Adriatic Sea at Aquileia. Amber was transported along this road to Rome, Greece and Egypt. Some sections were used even in the 19th century. The construction of the Budapest-Belgrade railway is a part of the “Sixteen Plus One” project. This line would only satisfy the requirements of the region and China, if it was extended to the Baltic countries in the North and to Piraeus in the South. Such a North-South transport corridor has a historical antecedent from the European antiquity, therefore it is justified to call it the New Amber Road. The realization of the New Amber Road would play an important role in the development of closer links between these countries. The authors conclude that the Western end goal of OBOR would not be an isolated CEE. The ultimate results should enrich the mutually advantageous partnerships between the whole Europe, including the whole of the European Union and China.The following paper is prepared by Gabor Braun, a senior economist at the Hungarian Institute of Foreign Affairs and Trade, a Think Tank affiliated to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary. In his paper “Chinese-Hungarian Economic Relations”, he argues that the ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative provides a proper and inclusive framework for strengthening the partnership with the interested countries along the New Silk Road. Closer economic cooperation in the fields of policy coordination, trade and investment promotion, infrastructure development and financial systems may also offer solutions even to some internal economic difficulties. Nonetheless, cooperation should be realized in different levels (e.g. China-EU, China-CEECs, bilateral and inter-institutional levels) and on voluntary basis according to the particular issues. One of the best example is the so-called “16+1 cooperation”, which incorporates different mechanisms and arrangements between China and sixteen Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs). Hungary perceives that it may have an outstanding position concerning the China-CEECs cooperation.The Report also includes two papers from CEE regional perspective. One is conducted by Viktor Eszterhai, who is an analyst at the Pallas Athéné Geopolitcal Foundation (PAGEO) fund by the Central Bank of Hungary. In his paper titled “The Central and Eastern European countries’ attitude toward the OBOR initiative: hopes and reality”, he introduces the general situation of the China-CEEC cooperation and points out that Central and Eastern European countries have been especially supportive toward the grand vison of the Chinese foreign policy, the “One Belt, One Road” , since the region sees the initiative as a unique opportunity to strengthen their economies in order to close the gap with the Western part of Europe. He also examines the validity of the optimism in Central and Eastern European countries toward the “One Belt, One Road” by introducing both the possible ­positive and negative impacts of the initiative. Another paper “China and V4 Region” is jointly prepared by the researchers at the Antal Jozsef Knowledge Center (AJTK), a prominent Think Tank in Hungary as well as in V4 region. Talking about Central Europe, we cannot neglect Visegrad Group (V4), which is a sub-regional cooperation fund by Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary after the cold war. After the accession to the EU, it is still an important platform to coordination and collective actions among the V4 states. V4 countries take 70% of trade volume between China and 16 CEE countries. Chinese may need V4 to represent BRI’s interest on a European level. However, plans should be more transparent to European and V4 partners. V4 might also need to join big institutions coordinating the realization of the project, like AIIB, and, parallelly, create their own institutions responsible for the same matter.The last but not least there are two papers contributed by GKI Economic Research, a prominent economic Think Tank. One is by Dr. Miklos Losoncz, a senior researcher, the other is by Andras Vertes, the President of GKI Economic Research, and once the premier candidate in 2009 in Hungary. Losoncz made a comparative analysis of the Visegrad countries concerning transfers from the European Union, and the capability absorbing funds. Vertes argues the impact of EU funds for the Hungarian economic growth and competitiveness.The idea of this Think Tank Report is born in Budapest when I was invited by the Central Bank of Hungary for conferences and seminars in November 2016. During the different academic activities, I got in touch with a number of Hungarian scholars and researchers, and felt the growing heat on BRI and on China-CEEC Cooperation, either from the academia or political figures. I was influenced by such a flame of friendship and made up my mind to work on editing a Think Tank Report to reflect the original Hungarian thoughts. The invitations had been sent and within two and half months, all the papers had been received. I appreciate very much for all the contributions from the authors and their hard work. Special thanks to those who had provided full support for the Report: Dr. Horvath Marcell, the director of the international cooperation at the Central Bank of Hungary; Peter Antal, director of the Antal Jozsef Knowledge Center (AJTK), as well as Adam Kegler, the deputy director of AJTK; Ambassador Marton Schoberl, director general of the Hungarian Institute of Foreign Affairs and Trade; Anton Bendarzsevszkij, director of the Pallas Athéné Geopolitcal Foundation; and Tamas Veres, counselor at the Hungarian Embassy in Beijing. Last but not least, the publication of this Report had received full support from Prof. Huang Ping, secretary general of the China-CEEC Think Tank Network, and Dr. Liu Zuokui, head of the office of the Secretariat. Without those support, it is impossible to provide the Report to the respect readers.I also would like to thank the team who makes significant contribution to the out come of Report. They are Dr. Li Danlin, the deputy direetor of Editor Board of Journal of Euroasia Economy, and Ma Junchi, a junior researcher at the Division of Central and Eastern European Studies, in the Institute of European Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. All the heartful thanks to their hard work.Dr. Chen XinFebruary 2017, Beijing and Budapest
关键词: “一带一路”  国际合作  研究  英文  

政府悖论、国有企业行为与中国经济和谐增长

作者: 褚敏
出版日期:2017-01-01
浏览次数:33次
简介: 中国持续了30多年的高速经济增长,创造了中国式“增长奇迹”,但增长背后存在的问题也值得我们深思。这是关系着中国改革的下一步怎么走、增长能否持续的问题。地方政府主导和国有企业垄断是中国经济转型的典型特征。那么,研究增长背后的问题就不能不考虑国有企业的影响,这也是本书从地方政府主导和国有企业垄断相结合的视角研究增长问题的缘由。本书的主旨在于回答这一问题:“地方政府主导及其与国有企业垄断的结合会将经济增长引致到一个什么样的发展轨道中?”本书通过界定地方政府主导的内涵,探索地方政府主导与国有企业垄断相结合影响经济增长的可能途径,为诸多的改革现象提供一个逻辑自洽的解释,进而为中国持续经济改革提供可供参考的政策建议。
关键词: 国有企业  影响  中国经济  经济增长  

中国特色社会主义政治经济学研究.2017年.第1卷:总第18卷

出版日期:2017-01-01
浏览次数:26次
简介: (以姓氏笔画为序)于金富 王立胜 王振中 王维国 卢现祥 朱方明朱恒鹏 任太增 任保平 刘秉龙 齐兰 纪玉山杜曙光 李政 李涛 杨春学 邱海平 邹薇沈坤荣 宋丙涛 张平 张宇 苏剑 周云波周文 周冰 赵学增 胡亦琴 胡家勇 侯风云洪名勇 宣烨 钱津 徐丹丹 高友才 黄茂兴程恩富 景维民 董长瑞 韩鹏 焦方义 谢地蔡继明 裴小革 裴长洪 樊明中国特色社会主义政治经济学在当下提出,体现了其特殊的时代意义。中国特色社会主义政治经济学的根本使命在于总结中国特色社会主义道路,确立应对经济“新常态”等现实问题的政策原则,把握中国道路的未来走向。中国特色的发展道路是中国独立自主选择发展方向和发展方式的道路。保持道路选择的自主性,要求掌握中国道路的话语权,形成解释中国现象、解决中国问题、指导中国政策的话语体系。从这个意义上讲,之所以在当前条件下提出发展中国特色社会主义政治经济学,其原因就在于当前比历史上任何时期都需要掌握关于中国道路的话语权,建立指导中国发展的话语体系。话语权的意义在于我们以自己的理论解释中国问题与中国道路——如何解释,关系重大——对过去30多年改革和发展道路的解释,既关系到对以往道路

大转型:供给侧结构性改革

作者: 马晓河
出版日期:2017-01-01
浏览次数:82次
简介: 从2015年11月中央财经领导小组第十一次会议提出,“在适度扩大总需求的同时,着力加强供给侧结构性改革”,至今已有一年多的时间。在此期间,“供给侧结构性改革”成为社会各界使用的一个高频词汇,各地区、各领域、各行业以及许多场合,言必称供给侧改革。然而,供给侧结构性改革不是一个筐,不是无所不包、无所不能。作为“十三五”时期我国政府管理经济工作的主线,正确认识和把握供给侧结构性改革的产生背景、深刻内涵、本质特征、思路目标等具有重大理论和实践意义。但是,怎么理解供给侧、需求侧,为什么在这个阶段提出进行供给侧结构性改革,供给侧结构性改革怎么改、都包括哪些内容,应注意哪些问题、需要采取哪些政策,等等一系列问题,尚在探索阶段。为此,2016年中国宏观经济研究院成立重大课题课题组,由马晓河副院长牵头,组织院部、经济所、外经所、产业所、国地所、社会所、市场所、体管所等科研人员,开展了为时一年的研究工作,最终形成缩写稿、总报告、6个专题报告和4个政策建议报告。在研究过程中,课题组阶段性成果陆续在国家发改委宏观经济研究院《形势要报》、国务院发展研究中心《经济要参》、中国社会科学院《世界经济调研》等内刊和《经济日报》《小康》等外刊发表。同时,受国家发展改革委委托,以供给侧结构性改革为主题,为国务院参事室、中国人民解放军火箭军、全国发改系统地市级主任专项培训班等进行多次辅导授课,受到广泛好评。由于我们研究水平和时间有限,本书研究可能存在一些不足和疏漏之处,敬请读者批评指正。课题组2016年12月
关键词: 中国经济  经济改革  

公私合作项目全寿命周期视角的契约设计与优化

作者: 孙燕芳
出版日期:2017-01-01
浏览次数:36次
简介: 2014年以来,公私合作(Public-Private-Partnership,PPP)模式在我国获得了巨大发展,世界银行称赞我国为全球推广PPP模式的领袖。我国将PPP模式称为政府与社会资本方合作模式,十八届三中全会提出了“允许社会资本通过特许经营等方式参与城市基础设施投资和运营”精神。2014年9月,财政部《关于推广运用政府和社会资本合作模式有关问题的通知》全面解析了PPP模式;2014年11月,国务院《关于创新重点领域投融资机制鼓励社会投资的指导意见》为PPP模式的进一步推广提供了新的政策依据。在政策的推动下,PPP模式现在“炙手可热”,超过22个国家部委和90%以上的省市地方政府均将PPP作为推进重大基础设施、区域开发、轨道交通和能源建设等的有效创新路径。PPP模式的研究和应用在我国还处于学术探讨和实践摸索阶段。从该模式的实践应用情况来看,项目运营中较多的不确定性因素使PPP项目的契约关系较为复杂,且具有典型的不完全契约特征。如果不能有效地解决公私部门之间的风险和收益的合理分配问题,将会影响PPP项目实现预期的经济效益和社会效益。本书以不完全契约理论为主要理论依据,从全寿命周期的视角研究如何通过契约的设计与优化来提高PPP项目公私部门间的合作效率。全书按照“发现问题—分析问题—解决问题”的思路设计研究内容,针对PPP项目中公私部门之间委托—代理关系引发的逆向选择和道德风险问题,通过设计持续经营选择权的实物期权激励机制,修正特许经营方特许期内短视化的自利行为;针对PPP项目协议不完全契约特征引发的项目剩余控制权配置难题,通过应用参照点效应理论,在项目契约中设计政府规制措施,实现公私部门间风险和收益的均衡分配;针对信息不对称和成本意识缺失造成的政府部门过度担保,引发潜在财政风险的问题,通过应用期权估价方法对政府担保成本进行合理估值,以及完善政府部门的信息披露制度,帮助政府部门优化政府担保决策;针对部分PPP项目获取超额收益侵害了社会公众利益的问题,通过公平偏好心理和行为策略分析,优化PPP项目对特许经营者的激励机制来调控超额收益。根据上述思路,全书分为四大部分共十章进行论述:第一部分:PPP模式的相关研究基础与研究现状分析。包括第一章至第三章,主要阐述本书的研究目的和研究意义、研究的理论基础、国内外研究现状,以及我国PPP项目的交易结构和存在的主要问题。第二部分:PPP项目全寿命周期视角下特许经营决策模型。包括第四章至第五章,首先构建PPP项目投资决策的基本模型,分析模型中受风险因素影响的关键变量和社会折现率的确定问题;然后在基本模型的基础上,从全寿命周期视角通过设计持续经营选择权,通过案例分析验证该选择权对修正经营者短视的自利行为的有效性。第三部分:特许期内PPP项目剩余控制权配置的契约设计。包括第六章至第七章,在全寿命周期特许经营决策的基础上,针对项目特许期内不确定性因素对项目收益产生的影响,根据不完全契约理论,解决项目控制权与现金流权配置中的剩余控制权契约设计问题。第四部分:风险收益均衡的PPP项目政府规制措施契约优化。包括第八章至第十章,首先,以实现PPP项目公私部门间风险和收益均衡为目标,通过多种政府规制措施组合方案的对比分析,为项目契约的优化提供决策依据。然后,对政府担保类规制措施进行实物期权估值,体现决策的成本效益原则。最后,从提高全寿命周期项目有效性出发,考虑特许经营者的公平偏好心理,为防止其采取不利于项目整体效益的惩罚性举动,对超额收益分享方案的进一步优化进行展望。本书是国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71501188)和山东省重大财经应用研究课题(ZDCJ-2016-5)的阶段性研究成果。研究团队成员有孙燕芳、何立华、周曲艺、张晓璇、鲁东昌等,在历时两年多的文献整理、项目调研、数据模拟、模型构建、案例分析等工作基础上完成了书稿;研究生张晓璇、鲁东昌、王晓月、曹永鹏、杜金章等认真地完成了书稿的校对工作;天津大学的张连营教授为本书的内容提供了很多宝贵的意见和建议。在此表示衷心的感谢!本书的研究结论是团队成员的个人观点,受知识水平和研究能力所限,如有不当之处,欢迎批评指正。孙燕芳2017年1月于青岛西海岸新区
关键词: 政府投资  社会  资本  公私合作  

马克思恩格斯城乡融合思想与我国城乡一体化发展研究

作者: 陈燕妮
出版日期:2017-01-01
浏览次数:28次
简介: 在中国经济发展进入新常态这一背景下,中国城乡关系如何实现一体,如何达成融合,仍然是错综复杂、远无止境的事情,而探索城乡关系的步伐一直未曾停歇。本文通过考察马克思恩格斯城乡融合思想产生的社会历史条件、思想渊源、发展过程以及主要内容,进而评价其历史地位,并对这一思想在中国的实践和发展历程进行深入的探讨,在此基础上分析我国城乡一体化发展的情况,从而总结马克思恩格斯城乡融合思想对当前我国城乡一体化发展的现实启示。

哲学七讲:大众读本

作者: 王家忠
出版日期:2016-06-01
浏览次数:171次
简介: 本书是马克思主义哲学普及化的一项尝试,论述深入浅出,简明扼要,贴近生活、贴近时代,视角新颖,通俗实用。全书包括七讲,依次是:哲学是时代精神的精华,物质、意识与实践,社会存在、社会意识与社会文明,联系、发展与规律,社会矛盾、社会变革与社会发展,认识、真理与价值,自由、必然与人的解放。
关键词: 哲学  普及读物  
上一页 1 2345下一页  第 /5页  跳转

版权所有:中国社会科学出版社 地址:北京西城区鼓楼西大街甲158号 邮编:100720

京ICP备05032912号-4