“德性”是20世纪后半期学术界比较热门的术语，在“德性”的光照之下，中西方都产生了德性伦理复兴的浪潮，国内外有许多学者将中西的德性之学进行比较。本书就是在此感召之下重点分析了思孟学派和亚里士多德伦理学的德性之旨和德性之用。认为双方都以德性为其伦理学的基础和依归，但前者具有天人合一的辩证思维，德性的先天性、内在性，情感的基础性，形而上学、伦理学和政治学合一的主要特色；后者具有认知的形式思维，德性的后天性，德行的重要性，理性的主导性，以及在形而上学、伦理学和政治学分离基础上统一的主要特色。而这些特色源于双方的社会体制和自然环境等方面的不同。

"Virtue" is a popular term in academia in the second half of the 20th century, under the light of "virtue", there has been a wave of moral ethics revival in both China and the West, and many scholars at home and abroad have compared Chinese and Western virtue. It is with this inspiration that this book focuses on the analysis of the purpose and use of virtue in the Simon school and Aristotle's ethics. It is believed that both sides take virtue as the basis and basis of their ethics, but the former has the dialectical thinking of the unity of heaven and man, the innate and inner nature of virtue, the foundation of emotions, and the main characteristics of the unity of metaphysics, ethics and political science; The latter has the main features of cognitive formal thinking, the acquired nature of virtue, the importance of virtue, the dominance of reason, and unity on the basis of the separation of metaphysics, ethics, and political science. These characteristics stem from the differences in social systems and natural environments of the two sides.（AI翻译）

暂无简介

用户未登录无权限查看参考文献