中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心长期关注中国法治发展、司法制度运行与司法改革，先后推出了《基本解决执行难第三方评估报告》《中国政务公开第三方评估报告》《中国政府透明度指数报告》《中国司法透明度指数报告》《中国检务透明度指数报告》《标准公开的现状与展望》《政府采购透明度评估报告（2016）》《中国高等教育透明度指数报告》等系列法治评估报告，以及《社会治理：新时代“枫桥经验”的线上实践》《社会治理：珠海平安社会建设》《社会治理：潍坊智慧城市实践》等“社会治理”系列报告。

《中国司法公开第三方评估报告（2018）》系受最高人民法院委托，由国家法治指数研究中心以31个省、自治区和直辖市以及新疆生产建设兵团的部分法院为样本，对审判流程信息公开和裁判文书公开的情况进行第三方评估后形成的分析报告。评估结果显示，通过建设统一的审判流程信息公开平台和裁判文书公开平台，统一了全国法院的司法公开平台、公开标准，方便了公众查询。未来还应从细化公开标准、落实公开责任、提升平台运行效果等方面，进一步深化司法公开，以实现以公开促公正、以公正提公信的目的。

The National Rule of Law Index Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has long paid attention to the development of China's rule of law, the operation of the judicial system and judicial reform, and has successively launched the "Third-party Assessment Report on Basic Settlement of Implementation Difficulties", "Third-party Assessment Report on China's Government Affairs Openness", "Chinese Government Transparency Index Report", "China Judicial Transparency Index Report", "China Procuratorial Transparency Index Report", "Status and Prospect of Standard Disclosure", "Government Procurement Transparency Assessment Report (2016)" and "China Higher Education Transparency Index Report" and a series of rule of law assessment reports, as well as a series of "social governance" reports such as "Social Governance: Online Practice of the "Fengqiao Experience" in the New Era", "Social Governance: Construction of a Safe Society in Zhuhai", and "Social Governance: Weifang Smart City Practice". The "Third-Party Assessment Report on China's Judicial Disclosure (2018)" is an analysis report commissioned by the Supreme People's Court and formed by the National Rule of Law Index Research Center using 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government, as well as some courts of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, to conduct third-party assessments of the disclosure of trial process information and judgment documents. The evaluation results show that through the establishment of a unified platform for information disclosure of trial processes and a platform for disclosure of judgment documents, the judicial disclosure platform and disclosure standards of courts across the country have been unified, which has facilitated public inquiries. In the future, judicial openness should be further deepened in terms of refining disclosure standards, implementing disclosure responsibilities, and improving the effectiveness of platform operations, so as to achieve the purpose of promoting fairness with openness and promoting public trust with fairness.（AI翻译）

暂无简介

用户未登录无权限查看参考文献