图书简介
中医是祖国医学之瑰宝,中华文化不可或缺的一个组成部分。可是西学东渐以来,中医的合法地位开始受质疑。特别是,近年来一些科学主义的激进分子甚至提出了“中医是伪科学”的命题,耸人听闻,混淆视听。另外,中医的辩护者们各自只是从某一个特定方面十分有限地作出辩护。在这种背景下,本书站在哲学的高度,从逻辑、社会历史和文化全方位地为中医进行辩护,它犹如一场及时雨,能够深层次地从学理上辨明真理,消解当前人们心目中的一个极大的困惑。因此,既有相当的理论价值又有非常深刻的现实意义。
Since the western learning was carried over from the west to China,the legitimacy status of the Traditional Chinses Medicine(TCM)was often under attack. After several time’s dispute about the abolishment and reserve of TCM,it’s important to argument the validity and the rationality of the TCM from the scientific principle’s perspective. In my opiniom,the premise of a reasonable assessment of the TCM is that we must have a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the nature of TCM,that is the keypoint about how to excavate,protect and develop TCM in the future. To this end,we need to carry out the metascience study of the TCM,to promoto the study of the philosophy and culture of the TCM,to provide a new perspective for the study of the nature of TCM,this can provide the epistemology and methodology support to establish the scientific and rational policy to re-energize the TCM. On the basis of a overall carding of the domestic and foreign scholars’ study on the TCM,we point out that there was deviation on the study of the nature of TCM. We should utilize the resources of modern philosophy systematicly to reveal the nature of the TCM roundly.By the researches on the characteristics of the basic theory of the TCM and its philosophy base,we believe that theory of TCM is much understandable,but it is weakly reliable. The fundamental reason for this is the TCM’s analogical thinking,which runs through the formation and development of TCM,We need a dialectical view to the role what the analogical thinking played in the TCM,and we should play its rational side,to enhance its reliability.Currently,the domestic study on the nature of TCM is focused on three perspectives,namely,logic,social history and culture. According to the logic perspevtive,the nature of science is the nature of the scientific theory,they concerned about the theory results of science,based on physical science,advocated to establish artificial linguistic like the modern physical science’s language. On the view of the classical philosophy of science,the scientific theories are more supreme than any other things in science. The classical philosophy of science adheres to theory-dominated philosophy of science,which confirm the scientificity of theory through the analysis of the logic structure of theory and the experiences confirm. Some scholars have emphasized that the TCM’s theory is lack of the rigor of logic,clarity,and testability of experience.As to the social history perspective’s TCM research is mainly in virtue of non-classical theory of philosophy of science. Focused on the sociology of scientific knowledge and the philosophy of scientific practices,which interpret the nature of TCM from the practical perspective,and which emphasizes the effectiveness of the treatment of TCM and its“lacal”;as well as some scholars emphasizes the cultute nature of TCM’s treatment from the perspective of culture.The three research perspective bases on different theory of philosophy of science,and in fact their own theory point out the different intension of science.On logic perspective,the sicience been taken as scientific theory,so the nature of science is the nature of scientific theories;according to the social history perspective,the science is been regarded as scientific acticities(or practices);and from the perspective of culture,the science be treated as a sub-class of the whole human culture. But looking at the development of the whole medicine or the development of the whole science,some are theories,some are practices,some are cultures,and medicine is Trinitarian. On the researches,we should utilize the three perspective’s resouces of philosophy of science;and should descript the nature of TCM fully from the three levels.I believe,after hundred years’ development,the theory of the philosophy of science could systematically analysize the theory of TCM on the basis of its accumulating theories and methods.Key words:Traditonal Chinese Medicine Classical Philosophy of Science Sociology of Scientific Knowledge Local Knowledge Culture
作者简介
图书目录
相关推荐
-
图书 中西形而上学之比较研究
作者:李蜀人
图书 中西形而上学之比较研究
-
2
图书 辩证法与实践理性:辩证法的“后形而上学”视野
作者:贺来
图书 辩证法与实践理性:辩证法的“后形而上学”视野
-
3
图书 形而上学、理性与辩证法——王天成自选集
作者:王天成
图书 形而上学、理性与辩证法——王天成自选集
-
4
图书 中国古代艺术政治学与艺术形而上学
作者:张志伟
图书 中国古代艺术政治学与艺术形而上学
-
5
图书 亚里士多德《形而上学》中being的结构
作者:[美]余纪元
图书 亚里士多德《形而上学》中being的结构
-
6
图书 太极之音:中国文化复兴之路
作者:龙晶
图书 太极之音:中国文化复兴之路
-
7
图书 艺术在中华文化复兴中的建构作用
作者:黄永健
图书 艺术在中华文化复兴中的建构作用
-
8
图书 留学生中医药文化认同研究:以中医药院校为例
作者:官翠玲 高山 陈阳
图书 留学生中医药文化认同研究:以中医药院校为例
-
9
图书 中医药历史与文化.第一辑
作者:陈玉梅 江凤艳
图书 中医药历史与文化.第一辑
-
10
图书 中医药历史与文化.第三辑
作者:陈玉梅 江凤艳
图书 中医药历史与文化.第三辑
豆瓣评论