简介： 本书在坚持历史唯物主义和辩证唯物主义根本方法的指导下，以微观权力作为分析场域和研究方法，从信仰主体、信仰客体以及信仰中介（媒介）这三个层面，针对当代中国马克思主义信仰在传播过程中所遇到的现实问题，在做横向重点分析的同时适当穿插纵向考察，以便揭示出马克思主义信仰在中国的继承与发展关系，从而为其在当代中国的深入传播提供可资借鉴的思想资源。在此基础上，针对当代中国所面临的国内外各种风险考验，系统阐释深入推动马克思主义信仰传播的主要路径。

简介： 青年是马克思形成和发展其哲学思想的关键时期，这其中蕴含着诸多待解之谜。本书立足青年马克思的重要文本，着重考察马克思哲学思想的出场语境及其内在逻辑，分析马克思对黑格尔、青年黑格尔派的内在批判，探究青年马克思视角的转换与主题的深化，主要从“思想起源”“法哲学批判”“政治批判”“政治经济学批判”“思辨哲学批判”“现代性批判”等角度阐释青年马克思的思想突围及其所开启的新世界观，以此澄明马克思哲学的思维特质与思想思境。

简介： 本书以生态关系与经济关系相统一的生态经济关系为研究主线，从马克思主义生态经济思想的视角分析了人类文明的发展历程，在此基础上着重阐释了工业文明转向生态文明的历史必然性。通过剖析工业文明的非生态观念样态和非生态表征，揭示出其发展模式的非生态经济性质；相应地阐明了生态文明的生态表征及其生态本质特性，并提出我国生态经济协调发展、生态文明建设的路径选择。新时代中国特色社会主义生态文明以人类文明前所未有的全新面貌展现在当今世界面前，它为解决人类面临的共同生态问题提供中国智慧和中国方案，为人类命运共同体的构建作出最大的贡献，并将开启整个人类文明辉煌发展的远大航程。

简介： 本书以历史唯物主义为指导，立足于当代现实，以人与自然之间的关系为视角，全面分析了马克思自然观蕴含的生态思想及当代价值。马克思自然观关于人与自然关系的生态思考，实现了对生态中心主义和人类中心主义的超越。马克思自然观蕴含的生态理性对于解决人类的生态问题、推动当代生态文明建设有重要的现实意义。

简介： 本书全面地梳理了新中国成立前在中国出版的马克思生平传记，重点研究了李季著的《马克思传》。李季著的《马克思传》是新中国成立前篇幅最长、内容最丰富、论述最全面的一部白话文传记，客观上扩大了马克思及其学说在中国的影响，推动了马克思生平及其思想在中国的广泛传播，研究价值重大。最后，深入探析新中国成立前马克思传记在中国传播的特点与启示。

简介： 本书基于自由之可能这一哲学根本问题，对费希特知识学理论的建构进行了深度阐释，并在此基础上对比了费希特的自由理论与马克思以“对象性活动”概念为核心的自由理论，表明了两种理论之间具有的相关性。本书以自由的构建为逻辑脉络分析了费希特前后两个版本的知识学：《全部知识学的基础》和《知识学新方法》，梳理出两个版本中自由体系的基本要素、推演逻辑及其理论的最终结果，指出《知识学新方法》对《全部知识学的基础》这一版知识学中的基本构件，即自我、非我及二者之间的关系进行了修正。这种修正指向一个理论目的，即为一种自由理论之可能做辩护。本书认为，费希特以自我为基础的自由理论是一种从主体出发向感性世界进行跨越的尝试，它既试图克服因康德对“物自体”的承认导致的二元论，也试图弥补唯心主义一直以来无法走出意识内部的理论缺陷。在费希特联结理性世界与感性世界的尝试中，想象力凭借其“摆荡”的特性被认作是桥梁和关键，并且其重要性在《知识学新方法》中得到了极大的提升。想象力概念之所以在费希特的理论中具有如此重要的地位，是因为费希特认为想象力作为一种无定形的力量以自由为本质，这使得它能够在理智世界与感性世界之间穿梭，将二者统一起来。费希特的这个推理逻辑建立在他如下信念之上，即自由作为一种跨越性能力，能够使自我超出主体领域达至感性世界。然而，费希特这一理论结构以及其中包含的实践要素被自我的绝对设定能力所掩盖，其后继者无论是谢林还是黑格尔，都只将注意力集中于费希特的绝对自我概念。经过青年黑格尔派的过渡，特别是在吸收费尔巴哈的感性理论之后，马克思在他的实践理论中发展出了类似的自由体系模型。在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中，马克思以对象性活动为核心在感性的人与自然之间建立起的多重关系，在结构上与费希特在知识学中建立起来的自我与非我之间的关系相类似。借助这个结构，马克思建立起了以能动的感性主体为承担者的对自然界的改造模式，在其中，感性的人实现其本质和自由。这种由结构的类似生发出来的理论上的共性证明，费希特的理论影响了马克思，特别是青年马克思的实践哲学。关键词：自由；想象力；对象性活动；实践AbstractBased on the fundamental philosophical question of the possibility of freedom,this book provides an in-depth explanation of the construction of J.G.Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre. Taking this as the basis, it compares J.G.Fichte's theory of freedom and Karl Marx's theory of freedom,the latter takes the concept of“Gegenstandliche Tätigkeit”as the core, and shows the correlation between the two theories.This book takes the construction of freedom as the logical context to analyze Fichte's two versions of Wissenschaftslehre:Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre（Foundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge） and Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo（Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy）,and sorts out the basic elements,the logic of deductions and the final result of the system freedom of in this two versions. It points out that Wissenschaftslehre nova methodohas revised the basic components in the Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre,namely das Ich,das NichtIch and the relationship between them. This revision points to a theoretical purpose of defending the possibility of a theory of freedom. This book argues that Fichte's Ich-based theory of freedom is an attempt to leapfrog from the subject to the sensible world. It not only tries to overcome the dualism caused by Immanuel Kant's reservation of“thing-in-itself”, but also tries to make up for the theoretical defect that idealism has always been unable to go out of consciousness and reach the sensible world. In Fichte's attempt to connect the rational world and the sensible world,imagination is regarded as a bridge and a key by virtue of its“schwebend（hovering）”characteristic, and its importance has been greatly enhanced in Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo. The reason why the concept of imagination is of such importance in Fichte's theory is that Fichte believes that imagination,as an amorphous force,has freedom as its essence,which enables it to be able to interact between and shuttle between the intellectual world and the sensible world, unifying the two. The logic of Fichte's reasoning is based on his belief that freedom,as a transcendental ability,enables das Ich to transcend the realm of the subject and reach the sensible world.However, the theoretical structure and the practical elements contained in Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre are overshadowed by the absolute“setzen”capacity of das Ich, and his successors, whether Schelling or Hegel,only focus on Fichte's concept of absolute Ich. After the period of the Young Hegelian, especially after absorbing Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach's theory of sensibility, Marx developed a similar model in his theory of practice. In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, the multiple relations Marx established between sensible humans and nature centered on“Gegenständliche Tätigkeit”is structurally similar to the relationship between das Ich and das Nicht -Ich established in Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre. With the help of this structure, Marx established a model of the active subject as the implementer changing the natural world, in which the sensible human realizes his essence and freedom. This theoretical commonality arising from structural similarity proves that Fichte's theory of freedom has an influence on the practical philosophy of Marx.Key Words:Freedom;Imagination;Gegenständliche Tätigkeit;Practice

简介： 本书紧紧围绕马克思的感性概念这一理论主线，在充分吸收国内外相关研究成果的基础上，从马克思的感性概念的思想史前提、青年马克思的感性概念、历史唯物主义确立时期的感性概念、感性与历史唯物主义的经济学批判、整体视阈中的马克思的感性概念、马克思的感性概念的当代解读和当代意义这六个方面出发，采用文本解读和理论分析相结合、逻辑和历史相统一、理论与实践相结合等研究方法，较为系统地梳理和考察了马克思的感性概念的本体论、认识论、方法论等多重内涵，较为深入地分析和探究了马克思的感性概念的重要理论意义与现实价值，较为深刻地揭示和展现了马克思所开辟的新的哲学道路与哲学传统。

简介： 改革开放四十多年来，中国经济保持高速增长，现已成功步入中等收入国家行列，成为名副其实的经济大国。但是其中的问题也不少，随着人口红利衰减、国际经济形势低迷等一系列内因与外因的作用，经济发展进入新常态。新常态下，中国经济下行压力明显，新旧动能转换，供给侧改革成为创新驱动发展战略的突破口，“释放新需求，创造新供给”被写入党的十八届五中全会公报，成为“互联网+”“中国制造2025”“大众创业，万众创新”“一带一路”等众多新动能的重中之重。如此重大的战略需要合适的理论给予指导和实际经验进行参照，但是目前理论界对于我国供给侧改革的研究大多来自西方经济学，而当下我国经济发展所面临的情况与当年西方明显不同，西方世界的国情和我国也有着本质的区别，生搬硬套无益于解决问题。供给侧改革不能只谈供给，要全面地看待问题，不能照搬照抄西方理论，要从本国的实际情况出发。马克思生产理论是关于生产乃至经济发展的最本质的理论，生产力的思想是社会改革的标准，但是目前学界从马克思主义思想的角度研究供给侧改革的成果很少，这不得不说是个遗憾。《马克思生产理论与中国供给侧改革研究》正是基于这方面的考虑，从马克思生产思想出发，对供给侧改革涉及的相关理论和历史经验进行比较，对当代中国供给侧改革进行研究分析。本书的总体思路是先进行理论比较和实际经验比较，在这两者的基础上进行供给侧改革的理论定位和任务解析，内容主要涉及马克思生产相关理论与西方经济学相关理论比较、供给侧改革的历史经验比较、供给侧改革的指导理论定位、供给侧改革的任务分析等，并在这些理论和经验的基础上探索生产系统平衡性问题、产能过剩问题、资本循环和劳动力转移，以及国有经济和公共产品等议题。本书的贡献和创新点在于：（1）在理论上探索了马克思的生产理论，并将其与西方经济学相关理论进行比较，区分其中的相似点与不同点，并最终运用到供给侧改革的研究中，阐明了中国的供给侧改革不能照搬西方经济学理论，而是应该在马克思生产理论的指导下进行。这不仅丰富了学界研究马克思主义现实问题的视角，而且在一定程度上解决了学界关于我国供给侧改革理论选择的争论。（2）在研究方法上使用了TFP（全要素生产率）的测算原理，用TFP原理探索了供给侧改革的生产系统平衡性问题，TFP方法的使用将供给侧改革的定位和方向阐述得更为明确和清晰。这个方法也为学界探索中国经济发展尤其是生产力提高路径，以及生产力提高以后如何实现新的供求均衡的发展提供了具体的方向。（3）在学术观点上提出供给侧改革要分析供给的“需求”改革和需求的“供给”改革。供给的“需求”改革和需求的“供给”改革的探讨能将供给侧改革的主体和客体分析清楚，让供给侧改革的任务“三去一降一补”更加明确和有的放矢。这个观点也可为学术界完善供给侧结构性改革的相关理论提供研究思路。关键词：马克思生产理论；生产力；供给侧改革AbstractDuring the 40 years after the Chinese economic reform,the economy in China continues to grow rapidly,successfully making China a middle income country and veritably a country of great economic power.However,with a series of internal and external causes,such as the decreasing demographic dividend,the accumulation of the risk of the“middle income trap”,and the profound adjustment of the international economic structure,economic development has become the“new normal”.Economic downward pressure becomes obvious under the new normal,where new and old drives convert,supplier-side reform becomes the breakthrough point of an innovation driven development strategy,and“releasing new demands and creating new supplies”were all issued in a communique of the Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th Communist Party of China（CPC）Central Committee,turning into one of the most important new drives among others such as“the Internet”,“Made in China 2025”and“Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation”.Such significant strategy requires an appropriate instructive theory and practical experience as reference.However,the most theoretical research provided by academia mostly derive from Western economics and the economic growth situation faced by the West at that time is apparently different than that faced by our country now.Moreover,the conditions of Western countries and our country is,in essence,different,and blindly following their path does no good to solving the problem.Marx's production theory is the most essential theory about production and even economic development.The thought of productivity is the standard of social reform.However,research on supplier-side reform from the perspective of Marxism is rare,which,not to mention,is a shame.This is where this paper,Marx's Production Theory and the Supplier-Side Reform in Our Country,sets out,comparing relevant theories on supplier-side reform with past experiences from the viewpoint of Marxism and analyzing the supplier-side reform of contemporary China.This paper is mainly about the instructive theoretical status of supplier-side reform,references of supplier-side reform from past experiences,and an analysis of supplier-side reform,etc.With these theory and experience as the basis,issues such as the balance of the production system,excess capacity,circuit of capital and labor force transfer,are explored.The innovation points:（1）This paper explores Marx's production theory in theory,compares it with the relevant theories of western economics,distinguishes the similarities and differences,and finally applies it to the research of supply side reform,and expounds that China's supply side reform can not copy western economic theory,but should be carried out under the guidance of Marx's production theory.This not only enriches the perspective of the academic circles to study the practical problems of Marxism,but also provides a different theoretical perspective for the academic circles to study China's supply side reform.（2）In the research method,the calculation principle of TFP（total factor productivity）is used to explore the balance of production system of supply side reform.The use of TFP method makes the positioning and direction of supply side reform more clear and clear.This method also provides a specific direction for the academic circles to explore the path of China's economic development,especially the improvement of productivity,and how to realize the new balanced development of supply and demand after the improvement of productivity.（3）From the academic point of view,it is proposed that the supply side reform should analyze the“demand”reform of supply and the“supply”reform of demand.The discussion of supply“demand”reform and demand“supply”reform can clearly analyze the subject and object of supply side reform,and make the task of supply side reform“three deletions,one reduction and one supplement”more clear and targeted.This view can also provide research ideas for academia to improve the relevant theories of supply side structural reform.Key words: Marx's Production Theory; Productivity; Supplier-side Reform